Wednesday, December 05, 2007

Refund of Additional duty of customs consequent to
Notification No. 102/2007-Customs dated 14th Sept,2007




The following points may be taken into consideration before
filing and claiming refund claim of the additional duty of customs.
1) Eligibility: when goods imported into India for subsequent sale .It covers only trading
goods who are liable to suffer sales tax in place of sale.
2) Time period for filing refund claim: Within six months from the date of duty payment as
.
per section 27(1)(i)(b) of the Customs Act 1962.The subsection 8 of the
section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act 1975 states that provision of the Customs
Act 1962 and rules and regulation made thereunder relating to refunds also
apply to the duty chargeable under the section 3.The additional duty of
customs is charged under sub section 5 of the section 3 of the Customs
Tariff Act 1975.Therefore provision of section 27 of the Customs Act are
also applicable for refund of additional duty of customs. The refund claim is to
be filed in the prescribed format under Customs Refund Application(Form)
Regulation ,1995.However, Unjust enrichment provisions are not attracted.
The notification itself says that it is the importer who is eligible for refund
claim provided he fulfill certain conditions as stated in the para 2 of the
Notification No 102.2007.Further the refund claim arose consequent to
payment of sales tax on imported goods and not in pursuance of
assessment order. There is no need to challenge assessment order before
appellate authority for such refund claim as held by Honorable SC in case
of Priya Blue and Flock India.
Argument for no time limit to file refund claim
a)But the Notification No 102/2007 does not specify any time limit for filing
refund claim. if any time limit is imposed for filing refund claim which is
consequent to the payment of sale tax on the imported goods at the time of
selling goods in domestic market, then, no refund of additional duty can be
availed for the goods sold after six months from duty payment. This is not
the legislator intention.
b)The additional duty of Customs is not a duty defined in the Customs Act.
The refund of duty is not to consequent to an order of assessment. No UJE
provisions are attracted. Then,only provision of time limit under section 27
is attracted,it is not legally correct.
As soon as goods are sold in the domestic market on payment of sale tax
and sale Invoice contains evidence of not availing Cenvat and payment of
sale tax,then,the importer is eligible for refund of additional duty of customs.
Hence, no time limit to file refund claim of the additional duty of customs.
3)Conditions to be satisfied for eligibility of refund claim as para 2 of the Notification
No 102/2007:
(a) The importer have to pay all duties;
(b) Not to avail CENVAT credit of the additional duty of customs .The
sale invoices should indicate specifically indicate in the invoice
that in respect of the goods covered therein, no credit of the
additional duty of customs levied under sub-section (5) of section 3
of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 shall be admissible;
(c) The Refund claim to be filed at the place of assessment and duty
was paid on the imported goods.
(d) the importer shall, inter alia, provide copies of the following
documents along with the refund claim:
(i) TR-6 Challan as documentary evidence for payment of the
said additional duty;
(ii) Sale Invoices of the imported goods in respect of which
refund of the said additional duty is claimed;
(iii) documents evidencing payment of appropriate sales tax or
value added tax, as the case may be, by the importer, on sale of
such imported goods.
4) No test of Unjust Enrichment(UJE).
If the sale Invoices of the goods carries proof of Sale
Tax or VAT payment and non-admissibility of the Cenvat credit on account of said additional duty of
customs then the importer is eligible for refund of duty.
It is concluded that the refund claim may filed on the strength of Sale Invoices. There is no UJE bar.
No time limit restriction if refund claim is filed within six month of duty payment. However,any claim
after six months of duty payment may attract provisions of time bar,which may be contested by the
customs department.
The department may also issue further clarification in this regards.

Ravindra Kumar

14 comments:

Unknown said...

The article is very knowledgeable. I wish to know more about how to claim refund. Can you please comeback to me at my email ID or phone no. 9810554300.

ravindra kumar said...

Dear Kewal,
Pl go through today`s
post.it will clarify some of issues involved in the refund of additional duty.
regards
Ravindra Kumar

ashish said...

Despite complying withall the conditions of notification 102/2007 dtd.14.09.2007, my claim of refund has been rejected to be paid to me instead directed to be paid to consumer welfare fund. The order says " In view of the fact that duty is being claimed as refund, the provisions of Section 27 in respect of Unjust enrichment will be applicable irrespective of the fact that notification no:102/2007 does not take any reference to these provisions. The sales bills have also not complied with the provisions of Section 28C where the component of customs duty can be clearly distinguished in their sales invoice.the possiblility of custom duty component being built into the price structure itself can not be ruled out. further it is seen that price structure has not changed before or after the notification".

Unknown said...

Hi Ashish,

Can you please provide me the copy of sales invoice, which you had submitted to the Customs. Also, can you please confirm the Customs Station, where you have file the claim.

My email ID is a.kewal@gmail.com

ravindra kumar said...

Dear Ashish,
You can file appeal before Commissioner (Appeal)within
two months of rejection of your refund claim.
As far issue of UJE,today Board
has issued circular stating that certificate from CA and self
declaration is enough for UJE.

you are reqauested to refer para 6 of the Circular No.6 /2008-Customs.

I Hope that you will get relief from commissioner (Appeal).
warm regards
Ravindra Kumar

AJAY said...

The Circular No.6/2008 – Customs dated 28/4/08 along with the Notification No.102/2007 regarding the refund of 4% ADC also talks about a certificate from the statutory auditor certifying that there is no unjust enrichment. I as an importer want to know how to satisfy my CA that there is no unjust enrichment in my case, especially under the circumstances that I have not changed my selling price pre & post the said notification. Please advise.

Unknown said...

You just need to take a certificate from your CA stating

"The burden of 4% CVD paid vide Bill of Entry no. ______ dt. ________ has not been passed on to the buyer M/s _____________ vide sale invoice no. ______ dt. _______.

The same is required to fulfill the requirement of unjust enrichment"

In addition to the aforesaid you shall also make a self declaration to the effect that you have not passed on the incidence of 4% CVD paid vide Bill of Entry no. ________ dt. ______ to M/s ________ vide sales Invoice no. ________.

I hope this will work for you.

You are requested to please confirm me if this will work.

Anonymous said...

Can anyone help me ?
I am getting custom exemption certificate for the goods I have imported but it is taking time to get that certificate and I am bearing demerage on that. Is it possible that I release the material by paying custom duty and it will be refunded to me later
sandeepshokhanda@gmail.com

ravindra kumar said...

Dear Sandeep,
You may adopt any strategy for speed refund:
1) clear goods provisionally,pending production duty exemption certificate. Give bank guarantee for differential duty or percetage of duty,if department consider your request.

2)Alternately, You can wharehouse your goods and clear after getting duty exemption certificate.

3) If department permits,you may pay duty under protest.But this very weak ground.
4)All your Books of Account to show
this duty as receivable from the Customs,Also, your sale invoice should clearly indicate that the excess duty paid is not charged to the buyer.Pl refer section 28C &D of the Customs ACT,1962.

You have to take all pre caution before clearing the goods,otherwise ,it will look as after thought.Further, Duty are charged which are existing on the day goods are presented for assessment.
Warm regards
Ravindra Kumar

Anonymous said...

I need guidance:

I am a manufacturer and am importing certain inputs for my own consumption. In trying to equalise freight costs I am having to import surplus material. I plan to trade in this surplus material ( which is in demand) at a price higher than my import price.

My question is :
What are the refunds and credits that I am entitled to as both a manufacturer and trader.

Also if I am selling the surplus material to non excise regd parties what are my excise and customs implications and obligations

Thanks
Sudeep Majumder
sudeepmajumder@hotmail.com

Anonymous said...

For claiming refund of SAD and obtaining early refund or for obtaining CA certificate, contact N.M.S. pvt ltd. 9810092750

ANAND SHYAMSUKHA said...

GET YOU ADDL. CUSTOMS DUTY REFUNDED, SAD REFUND AS PER CUSTOMS NOTIFICATION NO. 102/2007 DT. 14.07.2007. FOR PROCESS & EXECUTE PLS CONTACT : ANAND SHYAMSUKHA MOBILE NO. 09331035506 E MAIL: anandshyamsukha@gmail.com
WE COVER ALMOST ALL THE MAJOR PORT: KOLKATA SEA & AIR, CHENNAI SEA, NEHAVHEVA, JNPT, DELHI -TKD,

Anonymous said...

Sir
I am a statutory auditor for my client who is claiming refund under notification 102/2007 dtd 14.09.2007. We have verified the case & accordingly given the certificate. However dept want us to certify relevant annexures. Is it mandatory to certify the annexures. Pls advice.

Global Tax Guru said...

Dear Sir,
Yes ,you have to certify annexures.

Thanks
Ravindra Kumar

Google